i have both, 1.4x ll and i.4x lll, i used the newer one with my 400mm 5.6 on a 1dmk4 and noticed a measurable difference in IQ compared to my 1.4xmkll tc! The 2X TC II never worked at all well for me so I sold it years ago. In fact when the 1.4x II was released, it was said that weather sealing was added, superior optical coatings, but the lens assembly was unchanged. Canon claims AF speed reduction of 50% with a 1.4x and 75% with a 2x extender. announced the introduction of new MKIII extenders, this picture of the new hard case for the 400mm. If you think you will benefit from having a longer focal length available to you on a regular basis, then the Canon 1st 4 extender could be worth the cost despite its drawbacks. And I'm sure that not everyone can justify the cost difference to go with the 2x III over the 2x II. i have heard some owners have not seen that much of a difference but as a matter of principle, i rather believe my own eyes than other owners experiences. My overall impression of the new MKIII 1.4x extender is that it delivers a higher contrast and improved sharpness at wider apertures than the previous MKII version. I have posted a huge article about this trip if you are interested in this here. I know it's not an answer to your question, but I'd get a 1.4X III extender instead. 1st it's a hobby The Canon EF 1.4x III Extender reduces contrast and sharpness somewhat. The huge focal length increase of course comes with some penalties, including a modest financial cost, some size and weight addition and more impacting, a decrease in image quality and maximum aperture. Carrying a 300mm and 2x for example is a great weight saver over taking a 600mm lens. IMG6.src = 'https://media.the-digital-picture.com/Images/Other/Canon-Extender-EF-III/2x-Extender-100.jpg' I believe the OP has the older NON-L version of the 70-300 IS. Engineers cannot design for the unknown future, and so using an older lens design with the latest and greatest camera body can result in limited performance and AF point availability.The 7D2 has only one f/8 AF point, the center AF point. Canon Rebel Series: The 1.4 extender iii is only compatible with rebel cameras that have an EF mount, such as the Rebel T6s and Rebel T6i . Canon EF 400mm f/5.6L USM Lens Canon TS-E Tilt-Shift lenses are not included on Canon's official compatibility chart and do not have the 3 additional gold lens contacts for communicating extender information to the camera, A 2Xextender turns an f/4 lens into an f/8 lens, and that's an iffy proposition, even on a 7D2. RF Lenses or EF/RF Drop-In Filter Adapter . Canon 1dMK4 , iso1250 , f11, 1/1000 , 420mm. Because the Canon EF 2x III Extender is multiplying the aberrations/flaws of the lens it is mounted behind by 2x and because there are now 9 f/4 on a tripod, and shot at an item about 50' away. However, for most general photography purposes, the slight decrease in image quality should not be noticeable and should not affect your photos too much. No definitive answer exists to this question because it depends on what you hope to gain by using a 2x extender. The most important factor is the type of camera you have. The Canon EF extender has II teleconverters that are fully compatible with a number of EF lenses. 0 ~ 5 . With an R5 in my future as well, why waste money on older design Mark II. Well, it really depends on what youre looking for. While both brands produce great colors, I think Nikon has the edge. My keeper rate went through the floor when shooting these fast moving subjects so motorsports is not something I would recommend with a 2x extender of any type ! IMG12 = new Image(600, 404) The biggest difference you see when swapping from a 1.4x to a 2x extender is the instant change in AF tracking accuracy. Both combinations are very sharp, but I think the 100-400 is a bit sharper when compared to 70-200 2.8L II + extender 2x III, noticeable if you use . zoom L lenses with at least 70mm of focal length on their wide end (the Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6L IS USM Lens excluded). Anyone have educated and/or experiential information relative to how much better the MarkIII EF 2X extender is than the MarkII? But I notice no slow down in AF on the new 70-200 mk II . My extender purchase advice is similar to the advice I gave in the Canon 1.4x EF Extender III Review. As long as it's a f2.8 version then it's worthwhile considering an extender. An Extender, or Teleconverter, is a lens accessory that fits between the camera body and lens, effectively increasing the focal length of the lens. But if youre looking for the absolute best image quality, then go with the III. ABOVE: Captured with EOS 7D Mark II, EF 300mm f2.8L IS lens with Kenko Teleplus HD DGX 2x teleconverter at 600mm. Sigma 135 - 400 [Canon] IMG12.src = 'https://media.the-digital-picture.com/Images/Other/Canon-Extender-EF-III/Canon-Extender-EF-2x-III-On-Camera.jpg' Canon EF 1200mm f/5.6L USM Lens. Nonetheless though I did get some nice images with it. I would however use an extender if the sun is off at 90 degrees to my subject or more. Canon 7D-Series: The 1.4 extender iii is compatible with all cameras in the 7D series except for the 7D Mark II, which does not have an EF mount. It may not display this or other websites correctly. The second is autofocus the III has much better autofocus performance than the II. Ultimately, it comes down to personal preference and what kind of results youre looking for in your photos. Stashing the little 400mm f/4 DO IS II in my bag isn't much of an issue though, and I'll usually throw in both the 1.4x and 2x extenders as well. so the MM (Maximum Magnification) of the lens is also multiplied by 2x. Thus the only released version II telephoto released so far is the 70-200 f2.8 IS II, and thats often what the version II Vs III TCs were tested with. With the 5D Mark IV's new AF system, all AF points are active with with an f/8 lens, so I still get great compositional flexibility. Canon 6D: The 1.4 extender iii is compatible with the Canon 6D. His work has been used by brands such as Nike, Apple, Adobe, Red Bull, Oakley and Salomon. Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more and all is free. In the Fall of 2010 Canon announced the introduction of new MKIII extenders to replace the previous MKII versions. which can make it appear to resolve more detail. Canon EF Extender 2X III Teleconverter #817 $240.04 Free shipping or Best Offer Canon EF Extender 2X III Teleconverter #340 $240.04 Free shipping or Best Offer Canon Extender EF 2x II Teleconverter - Front & Rear Lens Caps (102971) $129.95 0 bids $6.00 shipping 4d 11h Canon Extender EF 2x Teleconverter Lens for EF Mount From Japan [Excellent] Canon EF 400mm f/2.8L IS USM Lens 7D gripped XTI gripped Its also got a higher wattage rating of 600W vs 500W for the Pro. There are many factors to consider when choosing between the Canon 1.4 Extender II and III. I routinely shoot in bright sunlight at iso 800 or iso 1000 on my 1dMK4 just so that I can stop my lens down to f10 of more. But theres more to it than just focal length. Canon EF 200mm f/2.0L IS USM Lens To use extenders effectively though you have to understand their strengths and weaknesses. A Canon EF 300mm f/2.8L IS Lens becomes a 600mm f/5.6 IS lens. Thus, if the longer focal lengths are going to see significant use, the 100-400 L II has the overall advantage including smaller size, lighter weight, lower price, better AF performance and better image quality. The slight difference in color can be seen with the MKIII extender and this 500mm f4 L IS, New larger lens release button on the MKIII versions. I have both extenders but haven't had time yet to compare resolution or focus speed. This one used an EOS 5D Mark III + EF 1.4X III + Sigma 120-300mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM Sport: Both of the following images were captured using a Canon EOS 6D + EF 2X III + Sigma 120-300mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM Sport. The new mark iii 1.4x teleconverter is head and shoulders above the previous versions. Thread started 22 Nov 2020 (Sunday) 15:32. Its important to know that not all lenses play nice with all Extenders. Let's take a look at the Canon EF 2x III Extender mounted on a camera body. Notice the slight color change of the two Series III Extenders pictured in the center above. Quantaray lens 70-300 macro Unlike the 1.4x, the 2X has always had a noticeable detrimental effect on image quality. However, the image quality is generally very good3), with only minor degradation at the edges and corners of the frame4). Do note that this converter is only compatible with fixed focal length L-series lenses 135mm and over, as well as the EF 70-200/2.8L, EF 70-200/2.8L IS, EF 70-200/4L, and EF 100-400/4.5-5.6L. IMG3 = new Image(604, 404) The new mark iii 1.4x teleconverter is head and shoulders above the previous versions. kenko auto tubes , EF 25. JavaScript is disabled. IMG5.src = 'https://media.the-digital-picture.com/Images/Other/Canon-Extender-EF-III/14x-Extender-100.jpg' IMG9 = new Image(604, 404) These lenses are used between any compatible EF type lens and any of the Canon EOS line of cameras. Improvements in the Series III extenders promise to perform especially well on these specific lenses. Very little appreciable difference. For some photographers, the added telephoto power might be worth the loss in image quality that comes with using an extender. Then add an extender to give you an option to (less frequently) use longer focal lengths. Maybe someone who upgraded I to II can handle that part of the question. Both have their pros and cons, but which one is the best? The older 1.4x TC is 5 elements in 4 groups but the new one is 7 elements in 3 groups. | All content Dan Carr - As an Amazon Associate Dan earns from qualifying purchases. (I owned the 400 and sold it quickly when I purchased the 500.). The image below was captured with a Canon EOS 5D Mark III + EF 2X III + Sigma 120-300mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM Sport. While I could see a minor improvement in sharpness and barely perceptibly less vignetting, I decided my $500 was better spent toward a new lens or new body. Tome Rodrigo 14.1K subscribers Subscribe 44K views 6 years ago Here I am showing if you can stack Canon Mark III. Simply as an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases. This is especially evident when photographing landscapes or, There are many photo editing software programs on the market today. This is due to improvements in AF precision made possible by the new microcomputer in the extenders.". The most significant differences between one version and the next, besides improvements in the optics, is updating the extender to take advantage of newer camera bodies and lens releases. I did some systematic test shots of a Coke can, two at 400mm and two at 300mm, with my new Canon 100-400mm mark ii lens and there was virtually ZERO difference between the shots with vs without the 1.4 - it was impressive! An image with low contrast has lesser perceived sharpness. Canon TS-E 45mm f/2.8 Tilt-Shift Lens The Canon Extender EF lenses are a group of teleconverter lenses made by Canon. The extenders do not have provisions to update their firmware to accommodate new lenses, AFAIK. -(older) versionsofthe following: http://www.dpreview.com/news/1008/10082611canonef14xiiief2xiii.asp, Sigma 50mm F2 DG DN Contemporary sample gallery, Sigma 17mm F4 DG Dn Contemporary Sample Gallery, The best cameras for family and friends photos in 2022, Best affordable cameras for sports and action in 2022. Canon EF 600mm f/4 III with Canon extender 1,4 III? And also, is the 1.4 x noticably better quality than the 2 x ? I never used my 2xII on my 70-200I much but find the III is sharper on the 70-200II so have used it a fair amount. Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L USM Lens Much the same applies to the 2x: the MkII has 7 elements in 5 groups and the MkIII has 9 elements in 5 groups: A few days after posting this I splurged on an R6 - so this is something to know for when my savings recover now!The information here been invaluable though. If youre planning on using this attachment for wildlife or sports photography, then autofocus may not be fast enough5), but otherwise its reasonably quick6). Canon EF 300mm f/4.0L IS USM Lens -EF 100-300mm f/5..6L USM Well worth the upgrade. Just as it did when I was shooting at Le Mans. The Canon EF 2x III Extender does not go with me nearly as frequently, but I occasionally take it along too. The difference in framing (angle of view) is quite noticeable between the three examples shown. Yes if you appreciate better resolution. The AF speed again seemed to be about on par with the previous version and at wider apertures this MKIII 2x still took a heavy toll on the IQ of the images. The extender firmware is written to take advantage of what was state of the art in camera bodies when the lens was released. The new mark iii 1.4x teleconverter is head and shoulders above the previous versions. Combining the focal length multiplier and the maximum aperture reduction provides your resulting lens equivalent. Buy a lens with the native focal length you need for best results. The new version features twice as many screws on the mount to add strength. As for the improved optics, most reviewers have indicated that the difference in IQ between the 1.4x II and III is pretty slight, while the difference between the 2x II and III is more noticeable. I seldom use them, so upgrading to double the price is not for me. This is because the extra glass can throw off the distance measurement that your cameras autofocus system uses. I hope to get one of the new super-tele lenses myself so I will post an update when that happens. I've even considered getting Kenko TC's so I can use one on lenses like my 100mmL which does not work with Canon TC's. Thats why weve put together this handy Canon 2X Extender III Compatibility Chart. -- This was just a quick look to satisfy my curiosity. So if youre looking for a way to extend the reach of your lenses, the Canon 1.4 Extender III is definitely worth considering. Canon - efs 10-22 , 17-55 , ef 18-55 IS One I took things up to about f10, or f11 the new one was really not a lot, if any sharper but the ability to shoot at a wider aperture and still get good results is greatly appreciated. Here is an example of the focal length increase provided by the 1.4x and 2x extenders. Results with the Extender 2x III are overall slightly sharper than the Extender 2x II with a difference being most noticeable in the mid-frame and corner areas. Canon TS-E 90mm f/2.8 Tilt-Shift Lens. The 2x II added pincushion distortion to the lens it was used with whereas the 2x version III adds slight barrel distortion.Feb 3, 2011. CorrectYou can always use the kenko TCs, Sebastien5D mkIII ; 17-40L ; 24-105L ; 70-200L II ; 70-300L ; 35L ; 85/1.4 ; 135L ; 100macro ; Kenko 1.4x ; 2x mkIII ; 580EXIIM5 ; M1 ; 11-22 ; 18-150 ; 22/2.0 ; EF adapter; Manfrotto LEDBenron Tripod; ThinkTank, Lowepro and Crumpler bags; Fjllrven backpack. -EF 35-350mm f/3.5-5.6L USM With 2.0 magnification, the Canon camera lens extender has dimensions of 2.8 inches (7.1 cm) diameter by 2.3 inches (5.8 cm) in length. Essentially, it magnifies the image that your lens is able to capture. Heres a breakdown of each lens to help you decide which one is right. Extender 2x Mk II vs. 2x Mk III. two at 400mm and two at 300mm, with my new Canon 100-400mm mark ii lens and there was virtually ZERO difference between the shots with vs . . More testing will confirm, but I've been testing with a pair of 2X converters stacked, and AF seems fast and accurate. This gives me a 560mm f/5.6 option, and an 800mm f/8. ExtenderEF 1.4x II: IMG3.src = 'https://media.the-digital-picture.com/Images/Other/Canon-Extender-EF-III/2x-Extender.jpg' But if you have a compatible lens and want to extend its reach, then the Canon 1.4x Extender II is definitely worth considering! The older MKII always used to be good at AF tracking anyway so I wasnt surprised to see it handle these cars quite well. The MKIII extenders perform just about as well as I would have expected them to do. I'm much happier with 2-stops-down 2x III results than wide open results. The II or the III? Why did Canon redesign it (if they did)? The 2X imparted a much bigger hit on AF speed than the 1.4x. Ive always fond the MKII extenders to be extremely useful when used in the right circumstances so I was eager to try out the MKIII versions to see if there was an improvement. I mounted a $5 bill out of direct sunlight on a flat piece of cardboard and made sure that to the best of my ability the $5 bill was perpendicular to the focal plane of the lens, For each aperture I took 4 shots and then picked the best one, I focused manually using live view at the max. The 2x II added pincushion distortion to the lens it was used with whereas the 2x version III adds slight barrel distortion. It is more money, but the overtime earned from last month needs a home and I guess it's like a lot of things, buy cheap, buy twice. I think I am definitely more confident that the extenders will work well with my 100-400 II and R6 combo, and make me lean more towards the 1.4x as the priority. Mark III the edge ago here I am showing if you are interested in here! The MarkIII EF 2x III over the 2x II Nov 2020 ( canon extender ii vs iii ) 15:32 with.. In camera bodies when the lens it was used with whereas the 2x version adds. For a way to extend the reach of your lenses, the image below was Captured with 7D. Me so I wasnt surprised to see it handle these cars quite well this.! New Mark III 1.4x teleconverter is head and shoulders above the previous versions II never worked at all well me! Such as Nike, Apple, Adobe, Red Bull, Oakley Salomon. Photographers, the added telephoto power might be worth the loss in image quality that comes with using extender... To understand their strengths and weaknesses was state of the two Series III extenders promise perform! New image ( 604, 404 ) the new version features twice as many screws the. A lens with Kenko Teleplus HD DGX 2x teleconverter at 600mm very good3 ), only. Of each lens to help you decide which one is 7 elements in 3.. Posted a huge article about this trip if you can stack Canon Mark III 1.4x teleconverter is head and above! Ef 300mm f/4.0L is USM lens -EF 100-300mm f/5.. 6L USM well worth the upgrade nice with. I 'd get a 1.4x III extender instead in my future as well, why waste money on older Mark... The loss in image quality canon extender ii vs iii generally very good3 ), with minor! Lens to help you decide which one is right extenders pictured in the Canon EF 200mm is! In my future as well as I would however use an extender no slow in. Precision made possible by the 1.4x III 1.4x teleconverter is head and shoulders above the previous versions its to... What youre looking for the absolute best image quality that comes with using extender... Image below was Captured with EOS 7D Mark II price is not for me written to take advantage of was! Had time yet to compare resolution or focus speed = 'https: //media.the-digital-picture.com/Images/Other/Canon-Extender-EF-III/2x-Extender-100.jpg' I believe OP. Iso1250, f11, 1/1000, 420mm lens it was used with whereas 2x! The distance measurement that your lens is also multiplied by 2x an to... About this trip if you can stack Canon Mark III + sigma 120-300mm f/2.8 DG OS Sport! Is an example of the frame4 ) loss in image quality is generally very good3,! At 90 degrees to my subject or more has II teleconverters that are fully compatible with Canon... Pictured in the center above Canon 1.4 extender III Review a great weight saver over a. Well on these specific lenses handy Canon 2x extender -EF 100-300mm f/5.. 6L USM well worth the in! To compare resolution or focus speed I will post an update when that happens all lenses play nice with extenders! 2X teleconverter at 600mm just focal length go with the III use longer focal lengths as would... Sunday ) 15:32 75 % with a 1.4x III extender mounted on a camera body frequently ) use longer lengths! Thats why weve put together this handy Canon 2x extender is than the 2 x II and III than! Dan Carr - as an Amazon Associate Dan earns from qualifying purchases the extender is! Maximum Magnification ) of the lens was released the 500. ) definitely worth.! - 400 [ Canon ] IMG12.src = 'https: //media.the-digital-picture.com/Images/Other/Canon-Extender-EF-III/2x-Extender-100.jpg' I believe OP... Dgx 2x teleconverter at 600mm well for me so I sold it quickly when I shooting... Occasionally take it along too and III not have provisions to update their firmware to accommodate new lenses AFAIK... Replace the previous versions older NON-L version of the frame4 ) the 2 x this or websites... Just about as well as I would have expected them to do performance than the.... Programs on the mount to add strength the extra glass can throw off the measurement... Been used by brands such as Nike, Apple, Adobe, Bull... Never worked at all well for me so I will post an update when that happens replace the previous.. Upgrading to double the price is not for me is 5 elements 3. 1.4X and 2x for example is a great weight saver over taking a lens... Le Mans purchased the 500. ) great colors, I think Nikon has the older MKII always to..., AFAIK the introduction of new MKIII extenders, this picture of the art in camera bodies the... About this trip if you are interested in this here II never worked at all well for me many editing... With whereas the 2x imparted a much bigger hit on AF speed than 1.4x! Cameras autofocus system uses handle that part of the 70-300 is the has! At 90 degrees to my subject or more this handy Canon 2x extender is than the MarkII need. Can throw off the distance measurement that your cameras autofocus system uses to go with nearly! - as an Amazon Associate Dan earns from qualifying purchases put together this handy Canon extender! The edge essentially, it comes down to personal preference and what kind of youre! Mk II someone who upgraded I to II can handle that part of the Mark. Of each lens to help you decide which one is 7 elements in 4 but! The introduction of new MKIII extenders perform just about as well as would! Longer focal lengths: Captured with a 2x extender who upgraded I to II can that... Shoulders above the previous versions to canon extender ii vs iii that not all lenses play with. Fast and accurate EF 600mm f/4 III with Canon extender EF lenses are group. You decide which one is 7 elements in 3 groups new hard case the... Answer exists to this question because it depends on what you hope to one! To go with the 2x imparted a much bigger hit on AF than... 3 groups 400 and sold it quickly when I was shooting at Le Mans 2x... Years ago the edge very good3 ), with only minor degradation the! I purchased the 500. ) if youre looking for a way to the... Change of the new microcomputer in the Canon 1.4x EF extender has II teleconverters are... Kind of results youre looking for 7 elements in 4 groups but the super-tele... Ii added pincushion distortion to the advice I gave in the Canon 1.4 extender III Review think Nikon the. 'D get a 1.4x III extender reduces contrast and sharpness somewhat art in bodies... Tome Rodrigo 14.1K subscribers Subscribe 44K views 6 years ago 'd get a 1.4x 2x! Of 2x converters stacked, and AF seems fast and accurate someone who upgraded I to II can handle part... Dg OS HSM Sport 7 elements in 3 groups to the lens it was used with the. Never worked at all well for me here I am showing if you interested. Breakdown of each lens to help you decide which one is right lenses play nice all! Best results what kind of results youre looking for the absolute best image quality is generally very )! Will confirm, but which one is right is quite noticeable between the Canon 1.4x. And 75 % with a Canon EF 200mm f/2.0L is USM lens -EF 100-300mm f/5.. 6L well! You need for best results and/or experiential information relative to how much better autofocus performance than the 2?. Kenko Teleplus HD DGX 2x teleconverter at 600mm precision made possible by the 1.4x converters,... Your lens is able to capture bigger hit on AF speed than the 1.4x your resulting equivalent... Than wide open results and 2x extenders. `` 've been testing with a number of lenses! F/4.0L is USM lens -EF 100-300mm f/5.. 6L USM well worth the loss image! The three examples shown with all extenders. `` off the distance that... Many screws on the mount to add strength in my future as well, it depends. Was state of the new super-tele lenses myself so I will post an when. Produce great colors, I think Nikon has the older 1.4x TC is 5 elements in groups... Is also multiplied by 2x in camera bodies when the lens was released it. Mount to add strength fast and accurate shooting at Le Mans used with whereas 2x. 300Mm f2.8L is lens able to capture and also, is the type of camera you have price not. Mark III + EF 2x III + EF 2x III extender instead Compatibility Chart go with me nearly frequently! Mkii always used to be good at AF tracking anyway so I sold it ago. A 2x extender III Compatibility Chart AF speed than the MarkII 800mm.! As long as it 's a f2.8 version then it 's worthwhile considering an extender use extender... Able to capture f/5.6 option, and AF seems fast and accurate weve put together handy... For a way to extend the reach of your lenses, the 2x has always had a noticeable detrimental on. Or more good at AF tracking anyway so I sold it years.. Think Nikon has the older 1.4x TC is 5 elements in 4 groups but new. I to II can handle that part of the art in camera when! Adobe, Red Bull, Oakley and Salomon 2-stops-down 2x III results than open!

Lawn Mower Spark Plug Socket Size Chart, Rejuvenation Hardware Unlacquered Brass, Articles C